• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | AMERICA | Voter Suppression in Texas, Past and Potential Future

Voter Suppression in Texas, Past and Potential Future

March 17, 2021 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
Voter Suppression in Texas, Past and Potential Future
Image by JoeSchmoYaKnow from Pixabay

Voter suppression in Texas is alive and well. What is its past and what is its potential future? Myrna Pérez examines these questions in an article published in Brennan Center for Justice. Here is an excerpt:

All Texans deserve a free, fair, and accessible elections system. And even though Texas politicians have been hard at work for years to build barriers to the ballot, voters have shown they won’t be stopped: Texans registered and voted in record numbers in 2020.

But while participation should be welcome in a democracy, Republican politicians in Texas are hard at work erecting obstacles to the vote, introducing a slew of bills introduced in the Texas legislature, including an omnibus voter suppression bill called S.B. 7. Legislators are relying on the dangerous, debunked myth of voter fraud to push for these restrictive bills. If the facts tell us anything, Texas politicians would do best to act reasonably instead: stop the alarmism and respect Texans’ access to the ballot.

Many of the proposed policies would interfere with the vote and are steps in the wrong direction. They range from restrictions on voter registration to tightening eligibility on absentee voting — a particularly noteworthy turn of events given that Texas is already more restrictive with those two things than most of the states in the country. And they are not really masking their intentions. For example, last fall, Harris County, home to Houston, offered the state’s first-ever 24-hour voting sites. But S.B. 1115 would keep jurisdictions from offering expanded hours for voting. S.B. 1113, on the other hand, punishes election officials if they do not purge voter rolls aggressively enough. Again, a step in the wrong direction given Texas’s past history with sloppy purges that disenfranchise eligible voters. For its part, H.B. 6 would limit the ability of election workers to protect voters against illegal disruption and harassment by “watchers.”

Read the full article here.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: American State Elections, Republicans, Voter Access, Voter Suppression

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • Donald Trump Misunderstands Ranked Choice Voting. It Will Help Not Hurt Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 14 hours ago
  • The Lack of Any Cause of Action Alone Should Doom DOJ’s Lawsuits in Both Alaska and California: DOJ Needs Actual Statutory Authority to Sue
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 18 hours ago
  • The Major Questions Doctrine Alone Should Doom DOJ’s Lawsuits in Both Alaska and California: Congress Would Not Hide Broad Federal Powers over State Elections in A Law Making Noncitizen Voting a Misdemeanor or in General Language in a Voter Registration Statute’s Preamble
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 19 hours ago
  • Timing Issues Alone (Laches and the Purcell Principle) Should Doom DOJ’s Attempt to Get California Election Officials to Pull Out Ballots from Purported Possible Noncitizens
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 19 hours ago
  • Ninth Circuit Panel Sets 1 PM Sunday Oral Argument on DOJ’s Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal and Los Angeles’ Motion to Dismiss in California Ballot Case
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 20 hours ago