• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / Democracy in America / What Nine Years Without The Voting Rights Act Looks Like

What Nine Years Without The Voting Rights Act Looks Like

June 25, 2022 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

What Nine Years Without The Voting Rights Act Looks LikeThis article by Ryan Suto, is published by FairVote. Here is an excerpt:

The Voting Rights Act (“VRA”) is an important example of how America does not always improve over the course of history, but opportunities nonetheless present themselves to chart a better path moving forward. The 2013 case Shelby County v. Holder is one such example, in which the Supreme Court claimed there was insufficient evidence of a racial gap in voter registration and turnout to justify upholding Section 4 of the VRA and allowing Section 5 of the Act to remain effective. Nine years later, we now have sufficient evidence.

As we have detailed before, the VRA, in part, required specified jurisdictions to gain “preclearance” from federal authorities before enacting changes to voting procedures. Like the rest of the VRA, Congress is able to update the specified jurisdictions upon re-authorization. However, in Shelby County Chief Justice Roberts wrote for the majority of the Court, “There is no denying, however, that the conditions that originally justified these measures [in the VRA] no longer characterize voting in the covered jurisdictions.” The Court reasoned that the coverage formula in the VRA was no longer necessary or appropriate, and it held Section 4(b) of the Act unconstitutional. In so doing, Roberts noted that in 2009 “African-American voter turnout has come to exceed white voter turnout in five of the six States originally covered by §5, with a gap in the sixth State of less than one half of one percent.”

Somehow the majority in Shelby County did not address the possibility that the VRA itself was an integral part of the progress that had been made as of 2009, which was acknowledged in the late Justice Ginsburg’s dissent. The Court assumed that the country is on an automatic march toward progress. Such notions of inherent historical advancement have been shaped by the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Hegel viewed human history as stages of increasing freedom, with an inevitable future of an improved human condition. The Supreme Court, essentially embracing this view, found Section 4(b) of the VRA unnecessary. The country, it seemed to be assumed, had improved past the point of requiring a Voting Rights Act. However, evidence from the past nine years of the importance of a fully functional and authorized VRA could not be more clear. 

Find the full article here.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: Election History, Voting Rights Act

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

american democracy around the web

  • “Kari Lake Files to Run for Kyrsten Sinema’s...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “Another resident from The Villages accused o...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “FOIA-Flooded Elections”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Could the Constitution itself defeat Trump i...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • CPJ Insider: October 2023 edition
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 3 hours ago