• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | ALL NEWS | WORLD | EU Urges Internet Giants to Work Harder Fighting Fake News

EU Urges Internet Giants to Work Harder Fighting Fake News

January 31, 2019 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

EU Urges Internet Giants to Work Harder Fighting Fake News
From Voice Of America

European Union authorities warned leading tech companies including Facebook, Google and Twitter on Tuesday that they need to work harder to combat fake news ahead of upcoming bloc-wide parliamentary elections.

The EU’s executive commissioners said that while the U.S. internet giants have made some progress, they need to pick up the pace of their work fighting disinformation and if their efforts are unsatisfactory, they could face regulation.

The Commission has been turning up the heat on tech companies ahead of the elections scheduled for May, in which millions of people in 27 EU member countries will vote for 705 lawmakers in the bloc’s parliament.

EU officials want to prevent the misuse of social media platforms by foreign groups trying to meddle in elections, and last year singled out Russia as a main source of disinformation in Europe.

Google, Facebook, Twitter and browser maker Mozilla are companies that so far have signed up to a voluntary EU code of conduct on fighting disinformation. The Commission said they’ve made good progress removing fake accounts and limiting sites promoting disinformation.

But officials are concerned that some tools the tech companies have introduced to scrutinize political ads have not yet been rolled out to all of the EU member countries.

“A lot of these initiatives are limited to a number of member states,” EU digital economy commissioner Mariya Gabriel said at a press briefing. “Let’s be clear: fake news knows no borders.”

The four tech companies are scheduled to start filing monthly reports in February on progress eradicating fake news from their platforms.

Twitter has closed fake and bot accounts as it prioritized fighting “malicious actors,” but the EU Commission said it wants to know more about how that will stop “persistent purveyors of disinformation” from promoting their tweets.

Twitter said it continues to “work closely with the European Commission to play our part in tackling” disinformation, including updating its fake accounts policy, improving tools to detect malicious activity, and giving users more options to report manipulation, including flagging fake accounts.

Google said Tuesday that it will now let European political parties and election monitoring groups use Project Shield, a tool developed by its cybersecurity incubator Jigsaw to defend against attacks aimed at overwhelming a website with traffic from multiple sources.

The Commission’s report comes a day after Facebook said it’s tightening up requirements for EU political ads by requiring buyers to confirm their identities and adding them to a public archive providing detailed information on who paid for them and the kinds of people they’ve reached.

EU Security Commissioner Julian King welcomed Facebook’s measures but said the company needed to give European researchers better access to its data. He said it should expand efforts to work with third-party fact-checkers across the EU, up from seven member countries currently.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: International Democracy Tagged With: Europe, Internet and Democracy, Journalism and Free Speech, Spying and Privacy, Voting Technology

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • Federal Court Speeds Up Considering Mary Peltola and LWV’s Motion to Dismiss the DOJ’s Complaint to Block Certification in Alaska Senate Race
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 hours ago
  • “Everything wrong with the DOJ’s uniquely embarrassing lawsuit against Alaska”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 hours ago
  • “Musk-Linked Dark Money Network Funded the Group Behind Cornel West’s Ballot Push”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 hours ago
  • Breaking: Ninth Circuit on 2-1 Vote Rejects DOJ’s Attempt to Get an Injunction Pending Appeal for California to Segregate Ballots
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 hours ago
  • The Meritless DOJ Alaska and California Voting Cases Provide No Basis for a Judge to Issue a Search Warrant for Ballots or Voting Machines
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 hours ago