• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / Democracy News Headlines / International Democracy / Zimbabwe Civil Society Protests Bill Broadening President’s Power

Zimbabwe Civil Society Protests Bill Broadening President’s Power

April 30, 2021 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Zimbabwe Civil Society Protests Bill Broadening President's PowerFrom VOA. VOA Zimbabwe correspondent Mlondolozi Ndlovu contributed to this article.

Forty-six Civil Society Organizations have expressed concern over the passing of the Constitutional Amendment Bill (Number 2) by Zimbabwe’s National Assembly, which will eliminate the presidential running mate clause in the country’s supreme law and give the president power to appoint members of the judiciary.

In a statement, the CSOs said, “It is very disturbing that the proposed amendments to the Constitution are being introduced at a time when the May 2013 Constitution has not been fully implemented. The amendments relate to critical thematic areas that include the appointment and retirement of members of the judiciary, appointment of the head of prosecution, removal of running mate provisions, extension of proportional representation provisions for female parliamentarians, composition of executive and legislative oversight role among other amendments.”

They urged all progressive citizens to reject this Bill, which they claim, reverses the gains that were ushered in by the 2013 Constitution.

“The adoption of this Bill will undoubtedly centralise too much power in the executive, particularly the President. Besides widening the scope of Presidential powers and undermining democratic accountability, this Bill unilaterally increases the size of central government and imposes an unprecedented burden on the already suffering citizenry.Taxpayers will bear the primary burden of a bloated government.

“The proposed amendments on the promotion of judges to the superior courts and extension of tenure of office for judges over 70 years will greatly compromise the independence of the judiciary. The proposed sections of the Amendment Bill are a backward step in the pursuit of democracy, accountability, the divisions of governmental power, representativeness, the rule of law and human rights in Zimbabwe.”

The CSOs noted that the adoption of the Bill entails further strengthening of the president’s powers while weakening the mechanisms intended to hold the president to account for his or her actions, wrongdoing and in some cases, illegal conduct.

“The adoption of the Bill also sets precedence to future and further amendments to the Constitution which will additionally undermine the democratic and civic space in Zimbabwe.

“… In essence, the Amendment Bill dilutes democracy, weakens the rule of law and undermines the promotion and protection of human rights in Zimbabwe, particularly those of a civil and political nature. At this juncture, the country is supposed to be focusing on the alignment of laws to the new Constitution, fully implementing provisions of the Constitution and not amending it.”

The CSOs urged the government to align laws with the country’s Constitution crafted by various stakeholders and adopted in 2013.

“The amendments are a mockery to democracy, a recipe for disaster and a violation of the principle of separation of powers.”

Information secretary Nick Mangwana and presidential spokesperson George Charamba were unreachable for comment as they were not responding to calls on their mobile phones.

Zanu PF administration secretary, Obert Mpofu, was also unreachable.

Zanu PF Youth League member, Mabutho Moyo, said his party is happy about the Bill “which contains issues relating to youth and women empowerment in terms of politics.”

He said condemning the Bill is “retrogressive”.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: International Democracy Tagged With: Africa, Dictatorships, Zimbabwe

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • Breaking: Eighth Circuit, on 2-1 Vote, Holds...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 hour ago
  • “As Trump Courts Gifts and Dangles Access, Co...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “When are big-money contributions to super PA...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “The End of the Rule of Law in America”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “The Neutral Criteria Myth”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 4 hours ago