• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / India’s Intolerance for Free Speech on Facebook

India’s Intolerance for Free Speech on Facebook

December 19, 2012 by Ajay Kumar Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
India map and facebook logo graphic: India’s Intolerance
A great coming together?

By Ajay Kumar

Free speech is a fundamental right enshrined in the Indian Constitution, yet certain members of the Indian police appear to have difficulty extending this principle to cyber speech on Facebook. India’s intolerance with police, particularly in instances involving religious topics, have over zealously acted to arrest Facebook users who post things they believe harm “social harmony” or “creates tension”.

Bal Thackeray politician India’s Intolerance
Bal Thackeray was an Indian politician who founded the Shiv Sena, a right-wing Marathi ethnocentric party active mainly in the western India’s Maharashtra. His followers called him the Hindu Hriday Samraat (“Emperor of Hindu Hearts”).

Following the death of the Hindu and Marathi nationalist leader Bal Thackeray, the city of Mumbai shut down for a day in observance of the period of mourning. On November 18th, Shaheen Dhada a 21 year old graduate posted on Facebook, “Every day thousands of people die, but still the world moves on. … Today, Mumbai shuts down out of fear, not out of respect.” Her friend Renu Srinavasan “liked” the post. Within ten minutes the police showed up at her door and took her into custody, and also arrested her friend while an angry mob of Shiv Sena (Shiva’s Army) supporters attacked her uncle’s clinic, smashing windows. Dhada, a Muslim, was charged with “promoting religious enmity” against Hindus.

The incident sheds light on two disturbing things: firstly, the fact that the Mumbai police appear to have been swept away in the fervor of mob-fueled anger, prompting them to arrest two girls who commented on the passing of a right-wing nationalist politician; secondly, the arrest reveals the sweeping and undemocratic nature of India’s Information Technology Act that governs electronic speech.

Rising of India’s Intolerance for Speech?

The section under which Dhada was charged prohibits speech that causes “annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will.” The Act is so wide in its scope that almost anyone could potentially be arrested for comments they make on the internet. Two months earlier, the police had arrested a political cartoonist for a cartoon that mocked corruption in the Indian government, charging him with sedition. A university professor in West Bengal was arrested for an email that contained a caricature of the chief minister. A businessman in Puducherry was arrested for a tweet criticizing the son of the finance minister.

To its credit, the Indian Supreme Court has ordered the state government to explain the reason for the arrest. The two policemen who arrested the girls have also been suspended while the magistrate who approved the arrest and the bail has been transferred.

File:Freedom Fast: India’s Intolerance
Freedom Fast, part of the opposition to the India Information Technology Act, was a hunger strike against internet censorship

The telecommunications minister has also released new guidelines for the Information Technology Act, ostensibly making it more difficult for people to be arrested under the Act. Yet, it seems that the Indian police are not so tolerant. On December 8th, a 20 year old student was arrested for posting a picture on Facebook depicting a Hindu god Hanuman sitting on top of a mosque. The police chief commented to Times of India, “We got the smell of tension. Three software specialists were pressed into service to find out the source of the controversial picture. Finally, Pintu Sahu’s account was located.”

Allowing the police to dictate the type of comments people may post online is more characteristic of a police state than a democratic country. While the police may be forced to release the individual they wrongfully arrested, the Act gives them a blanket of safety to hide behind. More troubling is that even if the arrest is found wrongful, there is now a chilling effect on free speech in India. People who hear about cases like these as well as the individuals who were arrested will be hesitant to use the free-speech rights they are entitled to out of fear. Indian civil society and public discourse will be strangled if these kinds of incidents continue. For India to maintain itself as a democratic country that respects principles of free speech, it must repeal the over-broad Information Technology Act and work to rein in the overzealous Indian police who feel empowered to arrest anyone they see fit.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Asia, India, Journalism and Free Speech, Racism and Prejudice, Religion and Democracy, Social Media and Democracy, Voting Technology

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Ajay Kumar

Ajay Kumar writes for Democracy Chronicles from Newark, NJ and is a graduate of Rutgers University. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • “Jan. 6 Rioters Are the New Hot Event in Town...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Clarence Thomas has long tried to undercut t...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Leader of pro-Eric Adams super PAC banking o...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Musk says he wants a new political party, an...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • Lawsuit on Alleged “Irregularities” in Rockla...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago