• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / The Responsibility to Protect: When is it Applicable?

The Responsibility to Protect: When is it Applicable?

June 17, 2016 by Joan Krickellas Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Responsibility to Protect

Following the genocides in Rwanda, Bosnia, and Kosovo in the 1990s, there was a serious international debate on how the world could effectively react when citizens’ human rights are grossly and systematically violated. The failure of UN peacekeepers in Rwanda who watched the Hutu slaughter 800,000 Tutsi, the failure of the UN presence to prevent murderous ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, and NATO’s controversial forceful military intervention in Kosovo, all showcased the frustrations and contentions resulting from both inaction and action in the face of atrocities.

There was clearly a need for the international community construct a new method by which to garner wider support to deal with mass atrocities.  Thus, The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) was created in 2005.  This doctrine deemphasizes humanitarian military intervention by outside states, focusing instead on the duty of a state toward its own population.  Specifically, it asserts that “sovereignty is a responsibility” of the state. The state should be accountable for four specific crimes (genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing), and must take responsibility for the welfare of its citizens and the humanitarian consequences of conflict. Only when a state fails to protect its people, whether because of lack of ability or lack of willingness, should the responsibility shift to the broader international community. Military intervention is a last resort.

Responsibility to ProtectUnlike prior human rights doctrines, R2P focuses not only on helping states when a crisis actually occurs, but takes on a holistic approach, determining the root causes of atrocities as well as how to rebuild post-conflict.  R2P seeks not to intervene militarily, but to delineate and reinforce the obligations of states to prevent, protect, and rebuild. It provides the framework for addressing all stages of the conflict cycle and for ensuring the focus on protection against mass human atrocities in times of conflict.

R2P clearly should have applied in Syria, from back in 2000 when Bashar Assad ruled under an authoritarian regime.  As stated in the Syria 2014 Human Rights Report, from the beginning “the regime routinely violated the human rights of its citizens…there were widespread abuses and violations of persons whom the government arbitrarily and unlawfully killed…government forces conducted systematic attacks against civilians in hospitals, residential areas, schools, and camps holding international displaced persons… the regimes continued the systematic widespread use of torture and rape, including those against children, targeted killing of protesters, bystanders, journalists, and medical professionals… restricted press, internet, and academic freedoms.” The list goes on.  So, clearly, the government of Syria failed to uphold its responsibility to protect, and thus, this responsibility shifted to the international community.

However, the US avoided using R2P as its basis for combatting the Syrian government’s gross violations of human rights. Perhaps if the US had seen the Assad regime as a problem, at least from 2011, just before the civil war began and less had been killed, the Obama administration would have used R2P. The escalation of turmoil, with the rise of ISIS, made the US hesitant to invoke R2P because of the fear of eventually committing to military intervention.  The Obama administration instead went through with $500 million plan to train and equip moderate rebels to combat ISIS and then to lesser extent, the Assad regime. This plan to let the Syrians fight for themselves massively failed.

As a result, the US looked to launching airstrikes against ISIS strongholds in Syria.  Then ironically, to justify these military actions, it used R2P.  While many deem airstrikes as a necessary measure since ISIS is a terrorist organization, justifying them under R2P may not be accurate. As mentioned previously, R2P emphasizes humanitarian intervention, with military force only as a last resort. In short, I am not questioning whether or not the R2P is necessary, rather when it can be applied.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Balkan Nations, Rwanda, Syria, Worldwide

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Joan Krickellas

Joan Krickellas is a student at Vassar College majoring in environmental studies, with particular emphasis in biology and women’s studies. Social issues she finds to be of particular interest include those that pertain to human rights, migration/immigration, discrimination, and climate change. She firmly believes that everyone should have the right to voice their opinions. Democracy Chronicles is where she feels comfortable in voicing her own.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC Authors

Heartbreak and Yearning on the Streets of East Oakland

May 19, 2023 By Joe Mathews

“Nightcrawling” by Leila Mottley is a bestselling novel that explores the hardships of life in Oakland’s struggling streets.

Podcast: Gen Z’s Fight For Democracy

May 18, 2023 By Jenna Spinelle

In his book “Fight”, John Della Volpe argues that Gen Z has not buckled under the weight of the events that shaped them.

Advertise button

Courts, Constitutions, & Democracy: A Failing System

April 29, 2023 By Andrew Straw

Equal protection on its face means that everyone is treated equally but the U.S. Supreme Court has limited equal protection.

Newsom’s ‘Campaign For Democracy’ Has A Democracy Problem

April 26, 2023 By Joe Mathews

The governor has sympathies for changes in governance; he’s deeply familiar with democratic innovation. But will he actually take on democratic reform?

Podcast: Between Democracy And Autocracy

April 19, 2023 By Jenna Spinelle

Between democracy and autocracy is an anocracy, defined by political scientists as a country that has elements of both forms of government.

Who Will Protect The Global Economy From California?

April 18, 2023 By Joe Mathews

This bank failure, the second largest in U.S. history, actually fits a very old pattern—of California and its industries putting the economies of the nation and the world at risk.

Split Level In Jersey

April 15, 2023 By Jamie Lampidis

Everyone has limits to their goodness, Like those structures in her oil paintings, Cartoonishly stretched to contain something within.

California, Keep Your Schools Open. No Matter What

April 14, 2023 By Joe Mathews

California’s school reopening revealed education disparities, highlighting the need to rebuild trust and relationships for addressing these inequalities.

More DC author posts

Democracy Culture

Using Beer As Reminder Of UK Voting Rule Change

Using Beer As Reminder Of UK Voting Rule Change

May 7, 2023

Brixton Brewery has launched a beer can campaign to encourage voters in the UK to bring their photo ID to vote.

Macron Honors Haitian Revolutionary, But Leaves Much Unsaid

Macron Honors Haitian Revolutionary, But Leaves Much Unsaid

May 2, 2023

Macron visited the prison where Toussaint Louverture died, praising him as a hero who embodied French Revolution values.

Iranian Secret Committee 'Punished Celebrities Over Dissent'

Iranian Secret Committee ‘Punished Celebrities Over Dissent’

April 28, 2023

Iran’s Secret committee sent a list of 141 to the economy ministry, including celebrities, raising more worries over freedoms.

Rewards Get People To See Truth In Politically Unfavorable Info

Rewards Get People To See Truth In Politically Unfavorable Info

March 30, 2023

People don’t carefully evaluate links for accuracy and that partisanship may be secondary to the rush of getting a lot of likes on social media.

Pussy Riot Will Receive This Year's Woody Guthrie Prize

Pussy Riot Will Receive This Year’s Woody Guthrie Prize

March 30, 2023

Russian performance collective Pussy Riot will receive this year’s Woody Guthrie prize honoring art for social change, award organizers said Thursday.

More Democracy Culture posts