• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

A Review of the Five-Year-Old Zimbabwe Constitution

by Farai Chirimumimba - May 30, 2018

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin
Five-Year-Old Zimbabwe Constitution
link

There is a fascinating question that scholars have long grappled with. Can adopting a new constitution lead to better democracy? Three such scholars, Todd A. Eisenstadt, A Carl LeVan and Tofigh Maboudi, recently explored this question in their global study of 138 constitutions from a 37 year period. They concluded that adopting Constitutions does not necessarily lead to better democracy for a country. Their findings showed that in too many countries, the Constitution-writing process excluded broad public consultation. As a result, the Constitution drafters were often able to grab power by codifying Constitutional benefits for themselves and their supporters. Unfortunately, this exact flaw may plague Zimbabwe. There, three political parties were part to drafting of the Constitution and the results are telling.

The current Zimbabwe’s Constitution was published in the Government Gazette on 22 May 2013. The Constitution came into operation on 22 August 2013 except for some parts that will come into effect in 2023. It is important to analyze whether this has led to better democracy. Words such as “impressed with the country’s new, democratic Constitution,” had been common since its inception. However, in some quarters the Constitution is usually touted as “a negotiated product between ZANU-PF led by former president Robert Mugabe and the two MDC formations led by the late Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and Professor Arthur Mutambara that formed Government of National Unity (GNU) in 2009-2013.

A drafter’s product or a public document?

The drafters of the Constitution fell under a body called the Constitutional Parliamentary Select Committee (copac) which was co-chaired by ruling ZANU-PF’s Paul Mangwana, MDC-T’s Douglas Mwodzora and MDC’s Edward Mkhosi. These three led a team of negotiators of their respective parties that were in the inclusive government. Although there were consultations throughout the country which were hurried, can we therefore say “a negotiated product” is a reflective of the will and aspiration of the people? Can we safely say, there is no doubt that the people ratified a new constitution rooted in democratic principles- equality, freedom, security, economic opportunity, and the rule of law and a constitutional model that can serve as a model for others in the region and around the world.

As we reach five years of using the Constitution, key questions centered on the motivation for those who called for the new Constitution remain. Did the drafters of the constitution want to fortify the nation’s stability by fortifying democratic fabric, or whether, instead, they want to grab power by codifying benefits for themselves and their supporters? Inclusive and widespread participation and not the hashed public consultations would have helped reduce the risk of having “a negotiated Constitution” between ZANU-PF and the two MDC formations.

The notable sad development that affirm that Zimbabwe’s Constitution was a “negotiated product” is when drafted handed the document to the principals: former president Mugabe, the late prime minister Tsvangirai and Professor Welshmen Ncube, who immediately locked horns over sticking issues such as the appointment of governors and the dissolution of power to provinces. However, a few days later, Mugabe Ncube and Tsvangirai were to stun the nation announcing that they have reached an agreement. Mugabe was quoted by The Standard, January 20, 2013 (article titled: Mugabe outwits PM Tsvangirai again) as saying: “We have come to the conclusion of the exercise. We are generally agreed and the finalization of the draft is now being made. We have at last come to the end of this marathon exercise,” Mugabe said.

A. Eisenstadt, A Carl LeVan and Tofigh Maboudi divided constitution-making process into three phases: drafting, debating, and ratification. They concluded that it was the drafting phase which if conducted incorporating a broad representation of actors in a transparent manner that would result in lasting benefits for democracy. Sadly, in Zimbabwe the drafting phase was shouldered in some form of secrecy where only ZANU-PF and two MDC formations representatives would lock themselves away from public scrutiny only to come out with a final product ready for a referendum and approval by parliament.

“In other words, what matters is who is in the room when the Constitution is initially conceived. We feel this is because no amount of societal vetting after the fact can make up for incumbent government failures to incorporate a wide range of societal interests, citizens, and political groups at the moment dialog starts,” Eisenstadt et al wrote. Taking Eisenstadt, et al arguments as a guide, one can conclude that the Zimbabwe Constitution making process was not all inclusive as it was more of a “negotiated product” between the aforementioned three political parties to the Government of National Unity (GNU). However, since there was an inclusive government in place one can also argue that a “negotiated product” was inevitable to reach consensus.

Most analysts agree that Zimbabwe was able to draft a Constitution with political rights and civil liberties similar to those of the Western democracies. However, there has been slow pace in aligning the relevant laws with the Constitution 5 years later. In 2016 the General laws Amendment Act made a piecemeal alignment of over 100 pieces of legislation to the constitution. Who can forget the anger and anxiety caused by the partisan alignment to the constitution and fast tracking of the Local Government bill in 2016 that left some emotionally damaged? What of the electoral laws alignment to the constitution that is currently a subject for debate in parliament ahead of the harmonized elections in July/August?

The publication of the Constitution 22 May 2013 was received as a step forwards towards dismantling the prerogatives of dictators and hybrid regime of Robert Mugabe and as planting the seeds of democratic expectations and norms. However, five years later the provincial councils meant to decentralize power to the provinces are not functional. The current government has perpetuated the unnecessary if not unconstitutional appointment of provincial ministers. Sadly, the National Peace and Reconciliation Commission have only begun to be fully functional almost five years later, when it was supposed to have begun immediately. The commission has a life span of 10 years meaning that its mandate ends in 2023 although others argue that the 10 years can only start being counted from the date the National Peace and Reconciliation Act of 2017 became operational.

View the 2013 Zimbabwe Constitution here.

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Africa, Robert Mugabe, Worldwide, Zimbabwe

About Farai Chirimumimba

Farai Chirimumimba is a journalist based in Zimbabwe. He researches and writes about political and security dynamics in Zimbabwe, drawing from his background in peacebuilding and conflict transformation for sustainable development. As a journalist and researcher, Farai also has special interests on knowledge of technical aspects on governance and electoral issues in Africa. He has been writing for Democracy Chronicles since early 2017. Farai is also a reporter for Spiked Online Media based in Zimbabwe.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | A Review of the Five-Year-Old Zimbabwe Constitution

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

Courts Off The Deep End, Again

By Andrew Straw February 1, 2023

Closing the courts, shutting down dissent, and violating the rights of whistleblowers. These are not the actions of an open, free society.

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

No One In Monterey County Is Good Enough To Serve In Legislature

By Joe Mathews January 9, 2023

California’s “democratic reforms” have left a place as… [key] as Monterey County without any state representation from one of its own.

In America, the Joe-mocracy Rules

By Joe Mathews December 27, 2022

A republic? A democracy? No, our country is an avuncular autocracy run by old guys named joe.

Property Rights, Indiana-Style

By Andrew Straw December 24, 2022

Indiana’s justices have replaced constitutional property rights with ad hominem politics. Replacing them starts with better governors.

To The American Oligarchs: Lay Off Us

By Jack Jones December 21, 2022

No matter how many jobs are ruthlessly pulled out from under us, we are still going to do what it takes to put food on the table.

Indiana’s Irrational Ballot Access System

By Andrew Straw December 4, 2022

Opposing the potential 2024 retention of the Chief Justice Loretta Rush will be key to preventing disability discrimination bad blood in Indiana courts.

Federal Judge Strikes Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness program

By Jack Jones November 24, 2022

What is unlawful is the Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down President Biden’s loan forgiveness program, not the program itself.

DeSantis Battles Trump in Florida Steel Cage Match

By Steve Schneider November 20, 2022

We take you now to the much-anticipated DeSantis-Trump steel cage match, in which “DeSanctimonious” has promised to “kick Trump’s ass.”

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Russian Wagner Boss Acknowledges Comparison With Rasputin

Russian Wagner Boss Acknowledges Comparison With Rasputin

January 30, 2023

Russian mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin responded to comparisons [with]…Rasputin who treated the son of the last tsar for haemophilia.

ChatGPT Is Changing Education, AI Experts Say

ChatGPT Is Changing Education, AI Experts Say

January 30, 2023

Newly-launched AI-powered chatbot ChatGPT is changing the internet landscape. It presents several opportunities, including in education.

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

FEC Hikes Contribution Limits Ahead Of 2024 Election Cycle

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

January 7, 2023

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in [America] report more depression and anxiety.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy